Sentence combining has been around for twenty years or more,
but it has been slow to find a secure place in writing textbooks. Style
and Readability in Business Writing1 (along with its
near twin, Style and Readability in Technical Writing), by Gary
A. Olson, James DeGeorge, and Richard Ray (Random House, 1985), is the
kind of book one wishes to see more of. It takes a particular approach
to teaching writing (albeit in this case an approach still in some areas
hotly debated), one with much in the literature to recommend it, and
gives it a full, book-length presentation. At 212 pages and $8.85, Style
and Readability can be either a supplemental or a main text; in
either setting, it should enhance any class in which it is used. While
one might question or quibble with a number of things about the book,
in the main it is a clear presentation of useful and important material.
Whether it can successfully defy what has become a publishing convention—single-approach
books don’t sell—is beyond the scope of this review.
Of the book’s two self-proclaimed focal points—style and readability—it
is much stronger on the former. The material on sentence combining is
thoroughly and systematically presented. But no particular readability
measures are presented, and the book consistently downplays (by omission)
the important components of readability that exist beyond the sentence,
beyond the paragraph, and beyond the text. Other important factors such
as purpose, audience and the role the writer plays are not discussed
at length in Style and Readability. The kind of attention characteristically
given to readability (as opposed to sentence combining) in this book
may be seen in the following passage, the introduction to Unite Nine,
Nominalizations: “Nominalizations are nouns formed from verbs
or adjectives that have been turned into nominals, another word
for nouns. We call this noun form special, not to praise it, but because
it often leads to special writing problems—the kinds of problems that
make sentences hard to read” (113). Unit Eight, Readability Guidelines,
offers ten excellent guidelines for improving the readability of sentences
(“Use Personal Pronouns,” “Avoid Difficult Words When You Can,” etc.),
but—as the authors themselves state—the guidelines are all on the sentence
level. On that level, however, Style and Readability makes a
thorough and effective presentation.
The book has nine “units” (actually chapters): Combining with Addition/Deletion,
Combining with the Wh-Connection, Combining with the Noun/Noun Connection,
Combining with the Ing/Ed-Connection, Miscellaneous Addition/Deletion
Strategies, Embedding Clauses and Phrases, Transposing Strategies, Readability
Guidelinse, Nominalizations, Paragraph Cohesion, and Open Exercises.
Most of the units follow about the same pattern: an initial presentation
of the particular strategy to be discussed (with examples), ‘Trial Run
Exercises,” and “Combining in Context” (with fifteen or so consecutive
sentences from a report on an appropriate topic, e.g., Theory Z, offered
one sentence per line). The general approach is typical to sentence
combining: instructions are given about how to combine elements (“Combine
the following sentences. ... Use the noun/noun connection wherever possible.”),
and groups of sentences are then offered to combine:
1. Theory Z encourages workers and managers to share.
Theory Z is a Japanese labor and management theory.
The workers are blue-collar workers.
The sharing is in decision making. (27)
This “Combining in Context” part of most
units also offers examples of typical kinds of business documents: for example,
twenty-four sentences from a letter of complaint, and eighteen from a response
to such a letter. Documents shown in the book include many kinds of routine
correspondence, various short reports, memoranda, legal briefs, and the
summary.
Later units of the book
present elements of writing that are perhaps too sophisticated for many
students. Consider, for example, this section from Unit Nine, Nominalizations:
Revising Nominalized Sentences
Using nominalizations as
subjects leads to reduced verb options, but it also leads to fewer options for
structuring the rest of the sentence. A writer, having chosen a nominalization
as a subject, risks losing control of the entire sentence.
Most any heavily
nominalized sentence will demonstrate this, but let’s look at example I again
(nominalizations are in italics):
1. A reduction in the company’s work forte was the result of the lack
of a favorable response by too many customers to its new products.
Here, the nominalized subject, reduction, produced the verb was.
With this subject and this verb, what options remain for continuing the
sentence? Not very many. If you choose to tinker with the verb, you might
consider such options as came about or became inevitable. (119)
The discussion of this
sentence alone occupies two pages, and one wonders whether most students have
sufficient interest in this one heavily nominalized sentence to sustain such a
lengthy presentation. While earlier units are not so wordy, the book as a whole
has about it that air of scholarly presentation (as opposed to textbook
breeziness) that says with every line it is not for freshmen, or for
unmotivated undergraduates either.
Just as the book’s style
and manner of presentation in general seem to be aimed at the very top part of
the college population, so the nature of its content places some tough
intellectual challenges in front of its readers. Unit Ten, Paragraph Cohesion,
is an excellent presentation of the subject (if its audience is taken to be
writing teachers), but its appropriateness for undergraduates is a
little questionable. It covers (1) cohesion in general, (2) repetitions,
variations, and substitutes, (3) location markers, signpost binders, and old
and new information—all key elements in cohesion—but the presentation alone
takes thirteen pages, all before the exercises start. This is Style and
Readability at its most demanding, quite possibly too demanding for most
undergraduates.
In the main, then, Style
and Readability is a clear and coherent presentation of the elements of
sentence combining applied to business writing. Before adopting it, one would
want to consider whether its singleminded focus on sentence combining is a
strength or a weakness (is it the sole text or a supplementary text?) and
whether the level of its content is appropriate for the students in question
(it is definitely not for freshmen). These comments, however, could be made in
one form or another about nearly any sentence combining textbook. An excellent
extended discussion of sentence combining is William Strong’s “Linguistics and
Writing,” Chapter Five in Perspectives on Research and Scholarship in
Composition (MLA forthcoming). Style and Readability has both the
strengths and the weaknesses characteristic of its approach—if you like
sentence combining, you’ll like this book.
University of Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee